Critique with criteria, not opinions
Separate summary from evaluation and judge against an explicit framework.
- 1Title Page
- 2Table of Contents
- 3Introduction
- 4Summary of Object
- 5Analytical Framework
- 6Critical Evaluation
- 7Conclusion
- + 1 more section
What it is & when you’ll write one
A paper that evaluates something — an argument, text, policy or dataset — against stated criteria. You’ll write one when asked to “critically evaluate”, “assess” or “critique”.
The scaffold you start with
Every section arrives as a labelled heading with guidance bullets and a suggested word count — generated the moment you create the document.
- 1
Title Page
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
- 2
Table of Contents
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
- 3
Introduction
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
- 4
Summary of Object
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
- 5
Analytical Framework
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
- 6
Critical Evaluation
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
- 7
Conclusion
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
- 8
References
Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.
How your answers shape the draft
Add as much or as little as you like — the only required field is the title. Everything else fine-tunes your scaffold, and most fields auto-fill straight from your brief.
- You addtext auto-fills from brief
Module / Course
your module or course code
Notesierlabels the document and seeds AI memory so every suggestion matches your subject
- You addtext auto-fills from brief
Deadline
when it is due
Notesiersets the pacing Assignment Copilot uses to keep you on track
- You addtext auto-fills from brief
Primary text / work
the title, author, edition or work
Notesierbecomes the object every claim is grounded in
- You addtext
Theoretical lens
your framework or school of thought
Notesiersets the interpretive approach for the analysis
- You addtext
Edition / source detail
page numbers, timecodes or translation
Notesierlets you cite precise, checkable textual evidence
- You addtextarea auto-fills from brief
Instructor notes
grading notes, required angles or constraints
Notesierbecomes high-priority guidance for the AI and section coach
- You addselect
Citation style
your required referencing style
Notesierformats in-text citations and the reference list in any of 15 styles, aiming for 2 citations per 1,000 words
What you get
- A short, fair summary kept separate from your evaluation
- An explicit analytical framework rather than scattered opinions
- Claims grounded in precise evidence
A student scenario
Evaluating a journal article’s methodology
A student critically evaluates a study. Notesier separates a fair summary from the evaluation and prompts criteria-based judgment of the methodology.
Related assignment types
Start your analysis free
Set up your critical analysis in minutes — drop your brief and start writing with structure, coaching and citations built in.