Research Papers

Review with a protocol, not vibes

Define PICO, lock your criteria, and chart what you find — transparently.

Notesier — Systematic / Scoping Review
Auto-generated scaffold
~5k wordsCited
  • 1Title Page
  • 2Abstract
  • 3Introduction
  • 4Methods (Protocol)
  • 5Results (Charting)
  • 6Discussion
  • 7Conclusion
  • + 1 more section
The basics

What it is & when you’ll write one

A structured review that follows an explicit protocol with locked inclusion criteria and transparent reporting. Common in health, nursing and evidence-based disciplines.

Structure

The scaffold you start with

Every section arrives as a labelled heading with guidance bullets and a suggested word count — generated the moment you create the document.

  1. 1

    Title Page

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

  2. 2

    Abstract

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

  3. 3

    Introduction

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

  4. 4

    Methods (Protocol)

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

  5. 5

    Results (Charting)

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

  6. 6

    Discussion

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

  7. 7

    Conclusion

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

  8. 8

    References

    Heading, guidance bullets and a suggested word count.

~5k words targetCitations: in your chosen styleWord budget per section
Guided setup

How your answers shape the draft

Add as much or as little as you like — the only required field is the title. Everything else fine-tunes your scaffold, and most fields auto-fill straight from your brief.

  1. You addtext auto-fills from brief

    Module / Course

    your module or course code

    Notesier

    labels the document and seeds AI memory so every suggestion matches your subject

  2. You addtext auto-fills from brief

    Deadline

    when it is due

    Notesier

    sets the pacing Assignment Copilot uses to keep you on track

  3. You addtextarea auto-fills from brief

    Review question

    the gap or debate you are synthesising

    Notesier

    organises your review by theme rather than paper-by-paper

  4. You addtext auto-fills from brief

    Search scope

    databases, years and inclusion limits

    Notesier

    builds your Search Strategy section

  5. You addtextarea auto-fills from brief

    Inclusion / exclusion criteria

    what counts in and what is excluded

    Notesier

    makes your method transparent and powers your charting logic

  6. You addtextarea

    Data / sources

    your dataset, participants or corpus

    Notesier

    informs the Methods and Results guidance

  7. You addtext

    Variables / instruments

    your measures, apparatus or tools

    Notesier

    is referenced throughout the Methods section

  8. You addtext

    Ethics / IRB note

    approvals, consent or anonymisation

    Notesier

    adds an ethics checklist item to your scaffold

  9. You addtextarea auto-fills from brief

    Instructor notes

    grading notes, required angles or constraints

    Notesier

    becomes high-priority guidance for the AI and section coach

  10. You addselect

    Citation style

    your required referencing style

    Notesier

    formats in-text citations and the reference list in any of 15 styles, aiming for 4 citations per 1,000 words

Outcomes

What you get

  • Protocol rigour with a defined question and criteria
  • A charting-led results section for transparent synthesis
  • Reproducible methods a reader could follow exactly
In practice

A student scenario

Research Papers

A nursing student’s scoping review

A nursing student defines a PICO question, locks inclusion criteria, and Notesier scaffolds a protocol-driven Methods section and a charting results section.

Start your review free

Set up your systematic / scoping review in minutes — drop your brief and start writing with structure, coaching and citations built in.